<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Road to OTA Digital TV &#8211; Step ONE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/</link>
	<description>TECHnically we&#039;re both!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:04:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linemanal</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Linemanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-989</guid>
		<description>http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=95898
here is post for antenna design..sorry about that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=95898" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=95898</a><br />
here is post for antenna design..sorry about that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linemanal</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Linemanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-988</guid>
		<description>To Laurent  Lasalle, Check out the Gray Hoverman UHF antenna. &quot;fly swatter&quot; type. Can be mounted indoor/outdoor, dependant on design. 40&quot; x30&quot; a DYI project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Laurent  Lasalle, Check out the Gray Hoverman UHF antenna. &#8220;fly swatter&#8221; type. Can be mounted indoor/outdoor, dependant on design. 40&#8243; x30&#8243; a DYI project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-913</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anyway, ABC will always be though to catch because it broadcast over VHF, which its signal as a shorter range.&quot;

Umm, that&#039;s totally wrong. VHF is between 30 - 300Mhz while UHF is roughly from 350 - 850Mhz. The lower the frequency, the farther the signal is able to go and reach as there is less resistance when passing through air, trees, houses etc. 

Adi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyway, ABC will always be though to catch because it broadcast over VHF, which its signal as a shorter range.&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm, that&#8217;s totally wrong. VHF is between 30 &#8211; 300Mhz while UHF is roughly from 350 &#8211; 850Mhz. The lower the frequency, the farther the signal is able to go and reach as there is less resistance when passing through air, trees, houses etc. </p>
<p>Adi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent LaSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent LaSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-910</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one missing the industrial looks of these rooftops antenas? Anyway, ABC will always be though to catch because it broadcast over VHF, which its signal as a shorter range.

I still haven&#039;t purchased any antennas; My girlfriend and I plan on buying something in the near future (we are still renting) and the condo where I live won&#039;t allow me to install anything on its roof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one missing the industrial looks of these rooftops antenas? Anyway, ABC will always be though to catch because it broadcast over VHF, which its signal as a shorter range.</p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t purchased any antennas; My girlfriend and I plan on buying something in the near future (we are still renting) and the condo where I live won&#8217;t allow me to install anything on its roof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Canuck</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Point taken Sir! But in all fairness I would expect the &quot;Dame&quot; to act like one in order to be treated like one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken Sir! But in all fairness I would expect the &#8220;Dame&#8221; to act like one in order to be treated like one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linemanal</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Linemanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-904</guid>
		<description>I must take exception to the quite liberal amount of &quot;Ma Bell&quot; bashing going on. More respect needs to be awarded the &quot; Grande Dame&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must take exception to the quite liberal amount of &#8220;Ma Bell&#8221; bashing going on. More respect needs to be awarded the &#8221; Grande Dame&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Canuck</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-881</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re gonna heat this thing too!!! W00t W00T!
You don&#039;t get service like this from Ma Bell anymore that is for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re gonna heat this thing too!!! W00t W00T!<br />
You don&#8217;t get service like this from Ma Bell anymore that is for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linemanal</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Linemanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-880</guid>
		<description>AS we both know reasoning behind combo was availability. I agree with Schultzer as to UHF, hence the thinking along the lines of rotor driven &quot;arrow&quot; type. Have to do more searching.  Doing panel heat re-installation. more later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS we both know reasoning behind combo was availability. I agree with Schultzer as to UHF, hence the thinking along the lines of rotor driven &#8220;arrow&#8221; type. Have to do more searching.  Doing panel heat re-installation. more later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schultzter</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Schultzter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-878</guid>
		<description>They all look like UHF channels, so why bother with a combo (VHF/UHF) antenna and just go with two or three UHF antennas?  Aren&#039;t UHF antennas usually smaller anyways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They all look like UHF channels, so why bother with a combo (VHF/UHF) antenna and just go with two or three UHF antennas?  Aren&#8217;t UHF antennas usually smaller anyways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schultzter</title>
		<link>http://www.2fatdads.com/2009/03/road-to-ota-digital-tv-step-one/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Schultzter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2fatdads.com/?p=563#comment-877</guid>
		<description>Now you just gotta hookup an HD PVR to the OTA antenna so you can record Grey&#039;s Anatomy for grampa!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you just gotta hookup an HD PVR to the OTA antenna so you can record Grey&#8217;s Anatomy for grampa!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
